Plato was not the only one who "complained" about "the inhuman and artificial" nature of writing. Seven centuries later, when the written word seemed to be already an integrated part of society, some of the monks in the Egyptian Desert were reluctant toward the graphic transmission of words, particularly the Scripture (the Word par excellence). Let's read Abba Serapion 2 (in The Sayings of the Desert Fathers, Cistercian Publications, 1987):
"A brother asked Abba Serapion, ‘Tell me a word.’The old man said, ‘What can I tell you? You have taken what belongs to the widows and orphans and put it on this shelf.’ (He saw that it was full of books.)"
Not that they were completely oblivious and ignorant of the entire (Greek-Roman)culture, but they definitely understood the Word different than we usually do: not as information, but as formation. Each word (and conversation) is changing the whole life of a person and the desert monks were asking for a "word", saying: "Father, give me a word that I may live/for my salvation". So, having books was not a problem per se, but keeping them on the shelf without application in one's life was seen as unacceptable. They were afraid that without the oral-aural transmission the word would become dead.
I'm wondering if the invention of writing had the human race forget the enormous power of each word, the word as a meaningful event .